Description
This book summarizes the work of Susan Goldin-Meadow, who has studied the gestures of deaf children who have never been exposed to language. She has found that these children use their gestures in a way that resembles natural language, and that these gestures have a unique inner structure. This work suggests that language may not be innate, but rather that it can be learned by children in a unique way.
Imagine a child who has never seen or heard any language at all. Would such a child be able to invent a language on her own? Despite what one might guess, the children described in this book make it clear that the answer to this question is yes . The children are congenitally deaf and cannot learn the spoken language that surrounds them. In addition, they have not yet been exposed to sign language, either by their hearing parents or their oral schools. Nevertheless, the children use their hands to communicate - they gesture - and those gestures take on many of the forms and functions of language. The properties of language that we find in the deaf children's gestures are just those properties that do not need to be handed down from generation to generation, but can be reinvented by a child de novo - the resilient properties of language. This book suggests that all children, deaf or hearing, come to language-learning ready to develop precisely these language properties. In this way, studies of gesture creation in deaf children can show us the way that children themselves have a large hand in shaping how language is learned. Review: In this book, Susan Goldin-Meadow summarizes her brilliant and ground-breaking investigations of the gesture systems invented by deaf children with no language input. Goldin-Meadow accomplished the seemingly impossible: she developed innovative methods and meticulously applied them to analyze these children's gestures. She shows us that the children's individual and combined gestures have an inner structure that shares many of the features of natural language. Is language innate? You can't answer that question without taking Goldin-Meadow's work into account. - Virginia Valian, Hunter College