Black Friday Early Deals Now Live!
VIEW DEALS

The Death of the Irreparable Injury Rule



The author of the essay, Laycock, argues that the irreparable injury rule, which states that courts will not grant an equitable remedy to prevent harm if it would be adequate to let the harm happen and grant the legal remedy of money damages, is dead. He surveys more than 1400 cases and finds that this rule almost never affects the results of cases. Instead, the real reasons for denying equitable ... more details
Key Features:
  • The author argues that the irreparable injury rule, which states that courts will not grant an equitable remedy to prevent harm if it would be adequate to let the harm happen and grant the legal remedy of money damages, is dead.
  • He surveys more than 1400 cases and finds that this rule almost never affects the results of cases. Instead, the real reasons for denying equitable relief are derived from the interests of defendants or the legal system, and not from the adequacy of the plaintiff's legal remedy.
  • He seeks to complete the assimilation of equity, showing that the law-equity distinction survives only as a proxy for other, more functional distinctions. Analyzing the real rules for choosing remedies in terms of these functional distinctions, he clarifies the entire law of remedies, from grand theory down to the practical details of specific cases. He shows that there is no positive law support for the most important applications of the legal-economic theory of efficient breach of contract.


R6 014.00 from Loot.co.za

price history Price history

   BP = Best Price   HP = Highest Price

Current Price: R6 014.00

loading...

tagged products icon   Similarly Tagged Products

Features
Author Douglas Laycock
Format Hardcover
ISBN 9780195063561
Publisher USA Oxford University Press
Manufacturer Oxford University Press, Usa
Description
The author of the essay, Laycock, argues that the irreparable injury rule, which states that courts will not grant an equitable remedy to prevent harm if it would be adequate to let the harm happen and grant the legal remedy of money damages, is dead. He surveys more than 1400 cases and finds that this rule almost never affects the results of cases. Instead, the real reasons for denying equitable relief are derived from the interests of defendants or the legal system, and not from the adequacy of the plaintiff's legal remedy. Laycock seeks to complete the assimilation of equity, showing that the law-equity distinction survives only as a proxy for other, more functional distinctions. Analyzing the real rules for choosing remedies in terms of these functional distinctions, he clarifies the entire law of remedies, from grand theory down to the practical details of specific cases. He shows that there is no positive law support for the most important applications of the legal-economic theory of efficient breach of contract.

The irreparable injury rule says that courts will not grant an equitable remedy to prevent harm if it would be adequate to let the harm happen and grant the legal remedy of money damages. After surveying more than 1400 cases, Laycock concludes that this ancient rule is dead--that it almost never affects the results of cases. When a court denies equitable relief, its real reasons are derived from the interests of defendants or the legal system, and not from the adequacy of the plaintiff's legal remedy. Laycock seeks to complete the assimilation of equity, showing that the law-equity distinction survives only as a proxy for other, more functional distinctions. Analyzing the real rules for choosing remedies in terms of these functional distinctions, he clarifies the entire law of remedies, from grand theory down to the practical details of specific cases. He shows that there is no positive law support for the most important applications of the legal-economic theory of efficient breach of contract. Included are extensive notes and a detailed table of cases arranged by jurisdiction.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.